O O O XPLG11 Closed day 24/06/2026 to day 24/06/2026 R$ ZQXX0ZQQXX — a recent low, after falling about 6.1% in 30 days. The equity value per share is R$ 105.25, which puts the fund trading to a P/VP of 0.857, that is, with R$ 105.25, which puts the fund trading to a P/VP of 0.857, that is, with 0.857. 14.3% discount on heritage.. In May this discount was only 7%. In just over a month, the market has doubled the "downgrade" it requires to carry one of the largest logistic shed funds in the country.
The question that takes sleep away from the cotist is not “why did it fall” — it’s what comes next: 90 is cheap or is the fair price of the risk that has accumulated for 2026? There is a critical contract maturity with the Free Market on ~80 days, a default on 5.9% on behalf of Mobly (which we have already covered), and an acquisition of R$ 631 million in April that divided opinions. This report dissects each vector and ends with a fair price range calculated with transparent methodology.
The XPLG11 in a minute
For those who are coming now: the XPLG11 is the fund of logistic warehouses of the XPLG11. XP Vista Asset Management Management (Note 8.5/10 in our management review — category BOA). It is one of the largest and most liquid FIIs brick B3: 31 real estate, 95 tenants, 95 ZQXX0ZQX million m2 ZQX1ZQQXXX million m2 ZQX1ZQQXX (Gross Leasable Area — the total square meters available for rent) and net worth of R$ 5.41 billion. They are 344,312 quotes.
The thesis is simple and powerful: modern logistics warehouses near large centers are the physical engine of e-commerce. The fund leases these spaces to giants of logistics operation and retail, with long contracts. The biggest tenant is the one. Free Market (ML), which occupies 17.2% of ABL in four contracts. The wallet has has 93% of contracts indexed to IPCAX% of contracts indexed to IPCAX, which gives the fund a good inflationary hedge — when inflation rises, rent rises together. The WAULT (weighted average term of contracts until maturity) is of 4.9 years.
The bottom business card is predictability: the dividend is locked in. R$ 0.82 by quotation 15 months ago, since January of 2025, and there has been no income cut for eight years. Liquidity of ~R$ 7.8 millions/day puts the XPLG11 at the top of the stock exchange. It is a bottom "blue chip" logistics — which makes the fall of 6% even more noisy.
Why did XPLG11 drop 6% in 30 days?
The drop from ~R$ 96 to R$ 90.23 does not have a single trigger. It is the sum of four vectors — a macro and three operational that accumulated in the calendar of 2026.
1) Selic in 14.75% — the opposite wind of the whole class. This is the background. With the base rate at the top of the cycle, the income investor compares the DY of ~10% exempt from a brick FII with a public bond that pays 14.75% nominal — and aggressively discountes the entire segment. It is not specific to XPLG11. The relief depends on Focus, which projects Selic ~11% in December/2026.
2) The maturity calendar of the Free Market. The largest tenant has three contracts maturing in the coming months — including the critical ML Peru at ~80 days. It is the vector that weighs the most in the perception of risk and deserves its own section (below).
3) Default in 5.9% — a Mobly. Mobly, which occupies 58,522 m2 in Cajamar, entered into judicial recovery, raising the default of the fund to 5.9%. We covered this in detail in the Previous article on Mobly — here it suffices to say that it is a risk already known and partly priced.
4) The financial expense pressing the result. The fund has R$ 802 million in CRIs (Certificates of Real Estate Receipts — the debt of the fund), with LTV of 18%. The latest series pays IPCA+8.76%, and financial expenditure rose ~46% year on year. In an environment from Selic to 14.75%, loading indexed debt costs expensive and makes up part of the distribution margin.
Reading of the set Reading of the set
A vector is purely macro (Selic) and tends to reverse with the interest cycle. The other three are operational and real — but two of them (Mobly and financial expense) have been in the price for weeks. What what what? It's not fully priced yet. It is the end of the contracts of the Free Market. This is where most of the uncertainty embedded in the R$ 90 lives.
The Risk Free Market: 80 days for maturity
The Free Market is the heart and Achilles heel of the bottom. Concentrates 17.2% of ABL in four contracts — and three of them are on the expiration radar in 2026:
| Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra Contra | off off type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type _ d d d d d type type type type type type type type type type type type type d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type d d d d d d d d d d d dlolololololololo type type type type type type type Type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type Type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type type | % ZQX0ZQQXX % | Vencimento |
|---|---|---|---|
| ML Perus Perus | Atypical Atypical | 4,7% | 13/09/2026 |
| ML Franco da Rocha da Rocha | Tipico Tipico Typico | 1,9% | 01/09/2026 |
| ZQX0ZZQX Extreme Extreme Extreme Extreme Extreme Extreme Extreme Extreme Extreme | Tipico Tipico Typico | 2,7% | 18/05/2026 (dead) |
The distinction between the two is worthwhile. Atypical and typical contract.: in the atypical, the tenant agrees to pay the rent until the end of the term even if he vacates the property (it is a strong guarantee of revenue — common in built-to-suit and sale-leaseback). In the typical, the law of the common tenant prevails: in the renewal, there is room to renegotiate value or simply leave.
O O O ML Perus Perus is the most sensitive case. It is atypical (ZQXX0ZQX% of ABL) and expires at 13/09/2026 — about 80 days. The Free Market has enormous scale and bargaining power; it can use the maturity to press for discount on renewal or migrate the operation. The typical ML Extrema has already won in 18/05/2026 and the status (renewed or left?) has not yet been confirmed. The typical ML Franco da Rocha wins at 01/09/2026.
How much is this worth in the dividend? Let's go to the worst illustrative case. The three contracts add up ~9.3% of ABL. If we imagine a combined loss of revenue equivalent to those meters vacating or renegotiating downwards, the impact on the fund's real estate revenue would be of the order of high single digit percentage. As the current DPS of R$ 0.82 already runs with some clearance of result, a shock of this size — in the most adverse scenario, with prolonged vacancy in all three — could push the distribution to the range of R$ 0.75–0.78, a cut of 5% to 9%. It is not the base scenario: the ML Perus is atypical (pays even if you leave), and well-located logistic sheds are usually re-located. But it is the size of the risk that the market is discounting today.
What to monitor in the coming weeks
The relevant fact that confirms the relevant fact renewal (or not) of the ML Extrema Extrema and the outcome of the ML Perus before 13/09 are the triggers that will unlock — or deepen — the current discount. As long as the status does not go out, the market priced the worst. An announcement of contract renewal removes much of the risk discount and makes room for the unit to converge to the equity value.
Piracicaba II: expensive or right shot?
In April of 2026, the fund bought the hammock Piracicaba II for 2026. R$ 631.5 millions 631.5 millions (161.9 thousand m2 to R$ 3,900/m2), paid in 97% with units issued at R$ 105.56/unit in 9emission. The operation raised the inevitable question: did the fund pay dearly?
The polemic point is the price per square meter. 3,900/m2 is a high table value for logistic sheds — standard sheds in consolidated regions usually trade well below that. Critics say the fund issued units near the VP (R$ 105.56) to buy an expensive asset, which does not create value per obvious unit.
The defense of the fund manager has two pillars. First, the asset is one. Warehouse under construction, already 75% pre-rented, with lease premium above the market average — i.e., the cap rate (the rate of rent return on the value of the property) comes out better than the gross price per m2 suggests, because the contracted rent is high. Second, the 9 issue as a whole brought about. R$ 919 million in new assets, gain of scale that dilutes fixed costs and improves liquidity. Buying with quotes near the VP is less diluting than issuing below equity.
The honest verdict: it is not a bargain, but neither is it an error of allocation. It is a bet on quality and location that will only be proven (or not) when the warehouse delivers and the pre-rent becomes current revenue. In the short term, added risk of execution to the perception of the market — another brick in the wall of discount.
How much XPLG11 is worth today?
The fair price of a brick FII is, first of all, a function of interest. The account is part of the annualized dividend — R$ 0.82 × 12 = R$ 0.82 R$ 9.84/quote/year — divided by the DY target that the market demands in each Selic scenario. The higher the interest, the higher the DY required and therefore the lower the fair price.
Using Selic and NTN-B as risk anchor and adding the typical spread of quality logistics FII, we come to three scenarios:
| Scenario scenery | DY-target required required | Cota justa Cota justa | P/VP implicit implicit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selic 14.75% (today) | ~10,5 – 11,0% | R$ 90 – R$ 94XX | 0,86 – 0,89 |
| Selic 11% (Focus Dec/26) | ~8,5 – 9,0% | R$ 109 – R$ 116XX | 1,04 – 1,10 |
| Baseline risk-adjusted risk-adjusted baseline risk-adjusted risk-adjusted | ~9,0 – 9,5% | R$ 103 – R$ 110XX | 0,98 – 1,05 |
The third line is the one that matters. From the base scenario of Selic to 11% (which would deliver R$ 109–116), we applied one. ~5% risk discount% risk discount to reflect the operational uncertainties of 2026 — the default of Mobly, the outcome of the ML contracts and the risk of execution of Piracicaba II. This brings the medium-term fair price range to medium-term fair price range. R$ 103 to R$ ZQX1ZZQXXX.
Is R$ 90 cheap or is it the fair value of risk? The two things, depending on the horizon. " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " single " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Today's interest scenario today's interest scenario, R$ 90.23 is at the base of the fair — it is not a screaming bargain, it is the correct price for a Selic to 14.75% with open operational risks. The market is not being irrational: it is pricing, with discipline, Mobly, ML and financial expenditure. No longer not more than the No more The medium-term outlook medium-term scenario, with Selic converging to 11% and ML contracts renewed, fair rises to R$ 103–110 — a potential of 14% to 22% over today's price, except dividends of ~10.9% year-over-year.
In the context of peer, o HGLG11 — the other logistics weight — trades under the same interest pressure. The reprecification thesis is valid for the entire class; the differential of XPLG11 is the greater patrimonial discount (14.3% vs. the lower discount of the XPLG11%). HGLG11) in exchange for a more visible short-term operational risk.
The analyst’s verdict.
Recommendation: MANTER (with trigger for ACUMULAR)
For those who are already unitholder: MANTER. The DPS of R$ 0.82 is locked for 15 months and covered, the discount of 14.3% on the VP is generous, the liquidity is the best of the exchange and the fund manager (XP Vista, 8.5/10) is first line. To sell the R$ 90 is to realize loss in a fund whose fundamentals remain solid — the fall is of mood and of short-term risk, not of structural deterioration.
For those who want to enter: ACUMULAR stepped shape, with trigger. The unit at R$ 90.23 is at the base of the short-term fair, with favorable asymmetry for the medium term. The green light to speed up the purchase is the confirmation of the renewal of contracts MLX contracts (Extrema and Perus) — this is the event that removes the greatest risk discount. Who buys before pays less, but carries the uncertainty of 80 days.
For whom it is — and for whom it is not — for whom it is not
The XPLG11 at R$ 90 makes sense for:
- O O O Investidor de Renda Investidor de Renda with horizon from 18 to 24 months, which wants to lock a DY of ~10.9% IR-free and capture the reprecification when Selic cede.
- Search Who searched Hedge inflation hedge — 93% of the contracts are corrected by IPCA.
- Who values who values who. liquidity and governance: being able to enter and exit large positions without moving the price, with a top fund manager.
- Who accepts to buy an asset with 14% real heritage discount 14% real heritage discount in exchange for living with the uncertainty of ML contracts for a few months.
The XPLG11 does NOT make sense for:
- Who wants it? Short-term dividend growth in the short-term — the DPS is locked and there is a risk of downward pressure if the ML contracts do not renew well.
- The investor who invests does not tolerate volatility It does not bother to see the unit oscillate while the relevant facts do not come out.
- Who needs the money in money? Less than 12 months — the penalty depends on the interest cycle, which has its own time.
- Who doesn't want to load? risk concentration risk concentration in a single tenant (ML, 17.2% of ABL).
In summary: the XPLG11 did not fall because it got worse — it fell because the interest rate is at the peak and the calendar of 2026 stacked visible operational risks. A R$ 90.23, the market already prices with discipline Mobly and financial expenditure; what still floats is the outcome of the contracts of the Free Market. Buyer today pays the fair price of a top interest scenario and gains the dual optionality of Selic relief and contract renewal. It is income position with upside capital — no short-term trade.
