RZTR11 Riza Terrax: Saldo de Resultado Acumulado caiu de R$ 2,50 para R$ 0,19 por cota após correção contábil em mar/2026

RZTR11: Cumulative Balance dropped from R$ 2,50 to R$ 0,19 per unit. Is the R$ 1,00 dividend at risk?

Riza Terrax's Management Report/2026 made a retroactive accounting correction that disappeared with 92% from the bottom mattress. The DPS is still standing — but now it lives on wages, not savings.

Direct answer: will I lose my dividend?

Not for the next few months. Yeah, in the bad first month.

The R$ 1,00/unit DPS RZTR11 It's okay. sustained by the operational result of the month, not the accumulated balance. In the three months of 2026 the fund generated on average R$ 1,03/unit and paid R$ 1,00 — 97,4% payout. The cashier goes in and out almost the same month.

The Accumulated Result Balance of R$ 0,19/unit is what is left after distributions. It's not the source of the dividend, it's the rest. Before the accounting correction, the unitholder thought he had a mattress of R$ 2,50/unit to cushion 2-3 bad months. Today this mattress is 19 cents — it covers less than a week of distribution.

Recommended position: KEEPING those who already have. Do not buy more above R$ 92. ♪ Don't sell on the first scare ♪ — the fund has 24 farms, 21 tenants and WAULT of 10 years. The risk has changed from zero to real, not imminent.

Accumulated Balance R$ 0,19 by unit (was R$ 2,50)
DPS monthly R$ 1,00 11 consecutive months ago
Payout 1Q2026 97,4% He distributed almost everything.
DY 12 months 13,4% quotation ref. mar/2026
P/VP 0,98 VP of R$ 91,74/unit
WAULT 10 years long contracts

What happened: the correction no one wants to see

The Riza Terrax Management Report of January 2026 reported that the Accumulated Result Balance was in R$ 2,50/unit. . It was this number that circulated in spreadsheets, forums and reports from research homes throughout the first quarter. It was the fund's security thesis: "Any bad month, distribute the accumulated."

The March Management Report (ID 1188230, released in May/2026) brought retroactive accounting correction: the real balance was R$ 0,15/unit in January, evolved to R$ 0,18 in February and closed March on R$ 0,19. The fund manager did not detail the origin of the R$ 2,35/unit error — possibly reconciliation between accounting result and distributable cash, or unrealised reclassification of revenue from Land Equity.

It's not fraud. It's not hidden damage. It's accounting that was wrong and it was fixed. But completely changes risk reading from the bottom.

♪ 'Cause it matters ♪

An IFI with robust accumulated balance can smooth distributions even in bad quarters. With R$ 0,19/bushroom unit, RZTR11 You don't have that flexibility anymore. Each month begins to count separately — and any default tenant, any heavy drop in the soy bag, any delay in closing Land Equity becomes a PSD cut the following month.

What supports R$ 1,00/unit now

Apart from the accumulated balance of the equation, the operating engine is left. And here the background continues to perform:

month (2026) Result/unit Distributed Leftover (salt)
January R$ 1,06 R$ 1,00 R$ 0,06
February R$ 1,02 R$ 1,00 R$ 0,02
March R$ 1,01 R$ 1,00 R$ 0,01
Quarter R$ 3,10 R$ 3,00 R$ 0,10

The fund is generating 1 to 6 cents more than it distributes per month. It's a tight margin.But it's margin. The revenue comes from 21 different tenants covering 84.075 hectares in 8 states, with average contractual rate of 15,01% a.a. in soybean sacks — one of the best-priced contracts in the Agro segment.

Diversification is real. The Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) of the immobilized is 0,07 — below 0,15 is already considered to be pulverised. The largest individual asset, Cedro I Farm (café-MG), represents 12,7% of the patrimony. No renter alone knocks down the bottom.

The real risks — without dramatisation

Risk 1: Soy R$ 127–130 CEPEA Paranaguá mar/26
Risk 2: VP falling -3,1% R$ 94,62 → R$ 91,74 in 3M
Risk 3: Concentrated revenue Quarterly crop+saphrey = lampy cash

Soy as an indexer. Riza Terrax's contracts are pre-fixed to sacks — the fund receives X sacks per hectare and the unit holder earns what these bags are worth on the market. With the R$ 127–130 in CEPEA Paranaguá, the result of R$ 1,01–ZQ2ZQX/unit is compatible. If the sack drops to R$ 100 (global full-crop scenario in 2026/27), the monthly result can retreat to R$ 0,80–0,85. With accumulated balance of R$ 0,19, there is zero margin to dampen.

VP dropping quarter after quarter. The equity value dropped from R$ 94,62 in Dec/2025 to R$ 91,74 in Mar/2026 — three percentage points in Ninety days. The fund manager cited financial obligations of Francisco and Dumont Farms in the RG as a factor of the movement. The fact is that P/VP of 0,98 today can become 1,02 tomorrow without the quotation changing.

Concentrated half-yearly revenue. Unlike brick funds with sprayed monthly rent, Agro receives around the harvest and safro — January/February and July/August concentrate flow. The fund provides linearly, but any payment delay in harvest month bursts the monthly result.

♪ The bright side that nobody celebrates ♪

Riza Terrax's strategy has three legs: Sale & Leaseback (51%), Buy to Lease (29%) and Land Equity (17%). . The first two are recurring income. The third is capital gain realized when the farm is sold.

In August 2025, the fund sold the Clarão da Lua G3 farm by R$ 108 million, with TIR of 20,5% a.a. and capital gain of R$ 41 millions. The unitholder who buys RZTR11 R$ 90 is not only buying R$ 1,00/unit/month dividend. It is buying 84,000 hectares of productive land in 8 states that value with agricultural inflation and expansion of the agricultural frontier — something that RZAT11 and PLAG11 They also offer, but without the Land Equity engine.

Valuation: expensive, fair or cheap?

P/VP 0,98 slightly below the pair
DY 12m 13,4% vs. Selic 14,75%
Quotation ref. mar/2026 R$ 90,12 check current quotation
Daily Liquidity ZQX0ZX mi 148 thousand unit holders

The R$ 90,12 (Mar/2026), the fund negotiates 1,75 percentage point below Selic in nominal terms — but the DPS is IR-free for a person. For a unitholder in the aliquot of treasure 15% or CDB, the gross equivalent DY would be ~15,8%, above Selic. Makes sense to keep it.

Buying more now takes conviction. Above R$ 92, the P/VP is above 1 and the DY drops to the 13% range. Without the accumulated mattress, to pay premium on assets in FII Agro indexed in soybean is to require much of the contract and the fund manager. The again attractive purchasing point is below R$ 88 — DY above 13,6%, P/VP of 0,95 or less, with margin for a possible positive reassessment of farms.

The truth no one wants to write

Accounting correction exposes something uncomfortable about RZTR11 and on the Agro segment in general: These funds have always operated without a real mattress. The R$ 2,50/unit was an accounting illusion that lasted three months. The reality is that the thesis is "wage on time" — the fund pays R$ 1,00 because it wins R$ 1,03. If you win R$ 0,90 in one month, you pay R$ 0,90. There's no reserve fund.

Whoever invests in FII Agro thinking they're buying the predictability of a logistics fund is buying the wrong asset. The income is good, but it is cyclical and indexed to commodity. The unit holder who understands this and follows in the position will be remunerated in 13%+ to the exempt year. What you don't understand is going to sell on the first newspaper cover about falling soy — and it's going to sell in the background, as it always does.

Disclaimer: This article is editorial analysis based on the Riza Terrax Management Report (ID 1188230) and public data. It is not a personalised investment recommendation. Quotes and indicators cited have as reference mar/2026; check current values before making any decision.

♪ To go deeper ♪

  • See the full background page with dividend history, CVM documents and analysis in /fiis/rztr11/.
  • Do you want to simulate how much you need to invest in FIIs to generate the passive income you need? Use Retirement Calculator From Rico to the Little.